Sumrall & Welch, PLLC
Call Us Today: 601-533-5551
  • Home
  • About
    • William Andy Sumrall
    • Thomas P. Welch, Jr.
  • Criminal Defense
    • Mississippi Criminal Defense
    • Bails
    • Drug Crimes
    • Drug Trafficking
    • DUI Charges
    • Federal And State Crimes
    • Murder Charges
    • Theft Crimes
    • Violent Crimes
  • Case Results
  • Blog
  • Contact
Sumrall & Welch, PLLC
601-533-5551
  • Home
  • About
    • William Andy Sumrall
    • Thomas P. Welch, Jr.
  • Criminal Defense
    • Mississippi Criminal Defense
    • Bails
    • Drug Crimes
    • Drug Trafficking
    • DUI Charges
    • Federal And State Crimes
    • Murder Charges
    • Theft Crimes
    • Violent Crimes
  • Case Results
  • Blog
  • Contact
Focused Criminal Defense Representation
  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Our Blog
  4.  » 
  5. Reversal in Court of Appeals on defense of necessity.

Reversal in Court of Appeals on defense of necessity.

On Behalf of Sumrall & Welch, PLLC | May 15, 2018 | Our Blog |

Martez Taylor was convicted on the charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in Hinds County in July of 2016. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction due to the trial court’s refusal to give a jury instruction regarding the defense of necessity. Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is generally a per se crime, that is, “taken alone”. Is the Defendant a convicted felon? Yes. Did the Defendant have a firearm? Yes. Guilty. However, even in cases such as that, one can have a necessity defense. The necessity defense requires a showing that “(1) the act charged was done to prevent a significant evil; (2) there [was] no adequate alternative; and (3) the harm caused was not disproportionate to the harm avoided.” Taylor’s girlfriend’s aunt was threatening Taylor and he grabbed the gun and fled. He went to his mother’s home and gave the gun and other items he had taken inadvertently in his rush to flee to his mother so that they could immediately be returned. (He was also indicted for robbery due to the taking of the items, but the jury acquitted him on that charge.) The trial court refused the necessity instruction and the State argued that Taylor kept the gun after the necessity had passed as he could have thrown the gun out of the motel room they were in, or handed it to his girlfriend. The Court of Appeals refused those arguments as “untenable” (a word that isn’t used nearly enough).

Categories

  • Drug Crime Defense
  • DUI Defense
  • Federal Crime Defense
  • Firm News
  • Our Blog

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Penalties for different drug crimes in Mississippi
  • Under what circumstances may police use drug-sniffing dogs?
  • 2 possible reasons to challenge a search warrant in court
  • Tips for fighting drug possession charges for medication
  • 3 types of drug crimes

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

We Are Ready To Fight For Your Rights

Sumrall & Welch, PLLC

Office Location

401 East Capitol Street
100m
Jackson, MS 39201
Jackson Office Location

Phone

601-533-5551
Review Us

Free background information available upon request

© 2025 Sumrall & Welch, PLLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw